Authentic science is based on the unfettered investigation of the way things are. The outcome of such an investigation may reveal degrees of validation of the null hypothesis – the hypothesis that has been proposed and that which becomes the subject of the investigation. The outcomes range from non-validation; fully verified authentication – cause and effect is clearly demonstrated and can be repeated; degrees of validation between these two extremes. The latter is generally arrived at through statistical probabilities
The scientific method is characterized by a progression incorporating observation, theorisation, discourse, experimentation and proposed modelling. The process is one of logical reasoning free of subjective bias such that the conclusion is never based on consensus. The subjective bias may incorporate limiting personal beliefs of the investigators as well as the appeasement of external influencers. Authentic science however is never for sale to the highest bidder!
Another critical component is required for authentication of the outcome of scientific investigation: The item or concept under investigation must be evaluated in different contexts in order to expose potentially concealed properties. The investigation in multiple contexts contributes to the phenomenon of integration and a far more authentic outcome than investigations occurring in a limited and isolated context. The latter may be referred to as silo-science since it is confined to a vertical silo without enabling integration between silo’s.
Over the past three C-19 years we have witnessed the violation of every component required for promoting and maintaining the sanctity of the authentic scientific method. The highest bidders have captured the investigations, the investigators and the narrative. The life blood of any scientific investigation is the discourse and the mediums which support this discourse. By discrediting those who challenged the captured narrative (with valid data) and suppressing their contribution to the scientific process, the highest bidders have stifled the scientific method and shattered a process which has evolved over thousands of years. Through their nefarious interference we have inherited a fragmented science which can no longer fulfill its role. With the greater portion of the data suppressed together with ongoing discreditation of those bearing that data we are witnessing a catastrophic implosion of our scientific heritage. The reality is that we can no longer trust many of our colleagues, research investigations and their outcomes as well as the directives emanating from that toxic space.
To regain a connection with our scientific heritage and restore the authentic scientific method we will need to re-build from the bottom, up. The process is fortunately underway. A global network of like-minded scientists and enlightened lay-public folk have ensured that authenticity is maintained. Many of these courageous individuals have paid a high personal price for this ongoing endeavour. But the truth of the matter is that this battle against the Forces of Darkness shows no signs of letting up any time soon. It is therefore imperative that we continue as we are – spreading validated information in support of authentic science and awakening, enlightening and inspiring others to see the light and contribute to the process.
Be strong, be courageous. We shall prevail.
This is the logo which I proposed as representing the folk standing up against the Covid shenanigans – Homo Integratus (See link).
Yes sir on point as always.
Excellent post Ian. A much needed reminder to reconnect us with the "scientific principle" which we seem to have been distracted/disconnected from. Appreciate your positive affirmations